About

Hey, I'm Tom. I'm working towards being a theatrical theorist. I write a bit, think a bit, sing a lot when I'm high. Hopefully you'll like something on here...

thecohort:

socialistictendencies:

logicallypositive:

ahh yes, the troops, protecting our freedoms by throwing us into FEMA concentration camps

I’m not even going to touch the FEMA camps shit, but fuck this. The troops protect themselves as they colonize the rest of the world, nothing more.

Dear socialistictendancies,
I don’t understand a lot of what you blog. I am an Australian libertarian socialist, so I suppose when I found your blog my presumption was that I would agree with most things you were to post. I do remember liking a lot of what you had posted before when I first came across you.
I don’t really feel very sympathetic towards your angle, after perhaps a month or two of following you. One thing that does irritate me is the way you sign off a lot of posts with comments that basically accuse whomever you’re debating, reblogging or whatever of being a completely ignorant fool. That sort of thing sets off alarm bells for me, only because I disagree with the idea that people should be insulted for holding a differing opinion to oneself. That includes a lot of capitalists, and doesn’t include rambling abuse of them in private company, of course.
Now to the point. Your understanding of international relations, in regards to a socialist/marxist perspective, seem grossly superficial to me. Let us take the above example.
People who join the military generally have a patriotic or economic incentive to do so. When they fight overseas, in the name (whether they know it or not) of imperialist expansion and exploitation, they very much do protect the privaleged western way of life. I mean this in so far as, without wars waged against exploited states, we would not enjoy the material opulence of this and the preceeding century. I would never agree that the existence and behaviour of the US military defends freedom, material wealth, equality etc, in the abstract or generalised to the world. However, for Empire and it’s European, Australian etc hangers-on, they do. Exclusively, and fantastically immorally, but they do.I point this out because it’s the sort of thing socialists have a terrible record of doing, much to our shame. The fact that the US’ military strength maintains it as Empire is true, we benefit from it, but by denying it we rob ourselves of the chance to criticize it. The militarized nature of Empire should be something we condemn, but without acknowledging it’s ramifications we cannot wholly or truthfully do so. It also basically constitutes lying about privalege, willfully, and denying the true nature of the system, which any leftist ought to despise instinctively. 
Also, to claim they ‘protect themselves’? That’s one of your comments I do not understand.
That said, it’s nice to see socialists popping up on tumblr since Occupy began. Hooray for people criticizing capitalism =D 
-Peter The Great

Who is Peter The Great? Why is he using Orwell arguments from an essay he read a few hours ago? Why does he seem so curly, so sexy, and yet somehow like he’s wearing a ‘writing hat’?
Anyway I agree with this guy, and not the other guy, yeh.

thecohort:

socialistictendencies:

logicallypositive:

ahh yes, the troops, protecting our freedoms by throwing us into FEMA concentration camps

I’m not even going to touch the FEMA camps shit, but fuck this. The troops protect themselves as they colonize the rest of the world, nothing more.

Dear socialistictendancies,

I don’t understand a lot of what you blog. I am an Australian libertarian socialist, so I suppose when I found your blog my presumption was that I would agree with most things you were to post. I do remember liking a lot of what you had posted before when I first came across you.

I don’t really feel very sympathetic towards your angle, after perhaps a month or two of following you. One thing that does irritate me is the way you sign off a lot of posts with comments that basically accuse whomever you’re debating, reblogging or whatever of being a completely ignorant fool. That sort of thing sets off alarm bells for me, only because I disagree with the idea that people should be insulted for holding a differing opinion to oneself. That includes a lot of capitalists, and doesn’t include rambling abuse of them in private company, of course.

Now to the point. Your understanding of international relations, in regards to a socialist/marxist perspective, seem grossly superficial to me. Let us take the above example.

People who join the military generally have a patriotic or economic incentive to do so. When they fight overseas, in the name (whether they know it or not) of imperialist expansion and exploitation, they very much do protect the privaleged western way of life. I mean this in so far as, without wars waged against exploited states, we would not enjoy the material opulence of this and the preceeding century. I would never agree that the existence and behaviour of the US military defends freedom, material wealth, equality etc, in the abstract or generalised to the world. However, for Empire and it’s European, Australian etc hangers-on, they do. Exclusively, and fantastically immorally, but they do.
I point this out because it’s the sort of thing socialists have a terrible record of doing, much to our shame. The fact that the US’ military strength maintains it as Empire is true, we benefit from it, but by denying it we rob ourselves of the chance to criticize it. The militarized nature of Empire should be something we condemn, but without acknowledging it’s ramifications we cannot wholly or truthfully do so. It also basically constitutes lying about privalege, willfully, and denying the true nature of the system, which any leftist ought to despise instinctively. 

Also, to claim they ‘protect themselves’? That’s one of your comments I do not understand.

That said, it’s nice to see socialists popping up on tumblr since Occupy began. Hooray for people criticizing capitalism =D 

-Peter The Great

Who is Peter The Great? Why is he using Orwell arguments from an essay he read a few hours ago? Why does he seem so curly, so sexy, and yet somehow like he’s wearing a ‘writing hat’?

Anyway I agree with this guy, and not the other guy, yeh.

(Source: )

OrwellSocialismMarx ma manpolitics Photo post # December 17, 2011 / 12:22am // 220 Notes

  1. dulcerawr reblogged this from e-a-r-t-h-s-h-i-n-e
  2. phob-phil reblogged this from rantingnraging
  3. rantingnraging reblogged this from angrylittledad
  4. pendarkspoliticalpage reblogged this from conservativebrew
  5. grandoldpartying reblogged this from talkstraight
  6. menorahrose reblogged this from girlactionfigure
  7. thejewishhippiewithabeard reblogged this from girlactionfigure and added:
    I’m pretty sure the US army have already been person of the year..
  8. girlactionfigure reblogged this from jaget and added:
    My Dad has been in the US Army for 20 years. I am extremely proud of him.
  9. jaget reblogged this from talkstraight
  10. neonarizona reblogged this from goodreasonnews
  11. wareq reblogged this from jethroq and added:
    Did this guy (and anyone with the same point of view) pay any attention to all the veterans that were at the OWS...
  12. risktakers reblogged this from goonieesneversaydie
  13. sporkaganza reblogged this from jethroq
  14. foxmulder reblogged this from john-a-zoidberg
  15. yourinsidesxrayed reblogged this from nerdydyke
  16. youremyfavorites reblogged this from feistyfeminist
  17. onevoiceonehope reblogged this from marylake
  18. loveheartsandcrime reblogged this from allieeebabyyy
  19. districtofcalamity reblogged this from conservativebrew and added:
    Unlike Time, not a sketchy pick.
  20. ellemarieh reblogged this from californiacommunist and added:
    As much as I hate to agree, lol. ^ This. Our soldiers should be protecting our country not policing the world. And no,...
  21. liebeengelbiene reblogged this from rumblesketch

Newspeak theme by Diana